VALIDITY, RELIABILITY, AND SENSITIVITY TO CHANGE OF A FRENCH VERSION OF THE ARTHRITIS IMPACT MEASUREMENT SCALES-2 (AIMS2) IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS TREATED WITH METHOTREXATE
J. Pouchot et al., VALIDITY, RELIABILITY, AND SENSITIVITY TO CHANGE OF A FRENCH VERSION OF THE ARTHRITIS IMPACT MEASUREMENT SCALES-2 (AIMS2) IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS TREATED WITH METHOTREXATE, Journal of rheumatology, 23(1), 1996, pp. 52-60
Objective, To develop and validate a cross cultural version of the Art
hritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (AIMS2) to be used by French speaki
ng populations. Methods, A French version of the AIMS:! was obtained u
sing back translation, committee review, and pretesting. The French AI
MS2 was studied in 127 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) about t
o receive therapy with methotrexate (MTX). Construct validity of the q
uestionnaire was assessed by factor analysis. Convergent validity was
evaluated by correlation coefficients with joint counts, pain assessme
nt, and sedimentation rate. Reliability was assessed by test-retest pr
ocedure at a 10-day interval, Cronbach's coefficients of internal cons
istency, and within scale factor analyses. Sensitivity to change after
12 and 24 weeks of therapy with MTX was assessed with computation of
standardized response means (SRM) and paired t test comparisons. Resul
ts, Factor analyses of the French version clearly identified the same
scales of the AIMS2, except for the walking and bending scale which lo
aded on several factors. Convergent validity of the physical and sympt
om components of the instrument was demonstrated by significant correl
ations with clinical and laboratory features. All the scales were reli
able (intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.65 to 0.90; percentage of
explained variance larger than 50% in all but one scale; Cronbach's a
lpha: 0.70 to 0.90). Sensitivity to change was demonstrated in 11 of t
he 12 scales (SRM: 0.30 to 0.77). Most of the improvement was noted by
Week 12. Conclusions, This cross cultural adaptation of AIMS2 in Fren
ch is valid, reliable, and responsive in patients with RA in whom MTX
therapy is instituted. It would permit international comparison studie
s. This study provides evidence for construct validity and responsiven
ess of the original version of the AIMS2, not demonstrated previously.