HEARING HAZARD FROM IMPULSE NOISE - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF 2 CLASSICAL CRITERIA FOR WEAPON NOISES (PFANDER CRITERION AND SMOORENBURG CRITERION) AND THE L(AEQ8) METHOD
A. Dancer et R. Franke, HEARING HAZARD FROM IMPULSE NOISE - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF 2 CLASSICAL CRITERIA FOR WEAPON NOISES (PFANDER CRITERION AND SMOORENBURG CRITERION) AND THE L(AEQ8) METHOD, Acta acustica, 3(6), 1995, pp. 539-547
Permissible exposure conditions to various weapon noises have been com
pared according to: (i) the Pfander criterion (Germany), (ii) the Smoo
renburg criterion (the Netherlands) and, (iii) the DTAT recommendation
(France) which is based on A-weighted L(eq8) measurements. The L(Aeq8
) method allows the assessment of the hearing hazard for all weapon no
ises according to the well-recognized procedure used for occupational
exposure (ISO R-1999). With a 85 dB limit this method does not lead to
overprotection of the soldiers, as it is the case for the criteria of
Pfander and Smoorenburg with respect to large-calibre weapon noises a
nd it allows for the evaluation of the actual hearing protection affor
ded by earplugs or earmuffs from classical Insertion-Loss data obtaine
d by Real-Ear-At-Threshold or Acoustical-Test-Fixture measurements. Mo
reover, the L(Aeq8) method is able to cope with exposure conditions wh
ich are difficult to evaluate on the basis of the former criteria (wea
pon noises in enclosures, combined exposures for example).