THE IMPORTANCE OF NORMALIZATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF DEPRIVATION INDEXES

Authors
Citation
Ms. Gilthorpe, THE IMPORTANCE OF NORMALIZATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF DEPRIVATION INDEXES, Journal of epidemiology and community health, 49, 1995, pp. 45-50
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
0143005X
Volume
49
Year of publication
1995
Supplement
2
Pages
45 - 50
Database
ISI
SICI code
0143-005X(1995)49:<45:TIONIT>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Study objectives - Measuring socioeconomic deprivation is a major chal lenge usually addressed through the use of composite indices. This pap er aims to clarify the technical details regarding composite index con struction. The distribution of some variables, for example unemploymen t, varies over time, and these variations must be considered when comp osite indices are periodically re-evaluated. The process of normalisat ion is examined in detail and particular attention is paid to the impo rtance of symmetry and skewness of the composite variable distribution s. Design - Four different solutions of the Townsend index of socioeco nomic deprivation are compared to reveal the effects that differing tr ansformation processes have on the meaning or interpretation of the fi nal index values. Differences in the rank order and the relative separ ation between values are investigated. Main results - Constituent vari ables which have been transformed to yield a more symmetric distributi on provide indices that behave similarly, irrespective of the actual t ransformation methods adopted. Normalisation is seen to be of less imp ortance than the removal of variable skewness. Furthermore, the degree of success of the transformation in removing skewness has a major eff ect in determining the variation between the individual electoral ward scores. Constituent variables undergoing no transformation produce an index that is distorted by the inherent variable skewness, and this i ndex is not consistent between re-evaluations, either temporally or sp atially. Conclusions - Effective transformation of constituent variabl es should always be undertaken when generating a composite index. The most important aspect is the removal of variable skewness. There is no need for the transformed variables to be normally distributed, only s ymmetrically distributed, before standardisation. Even where additiona l parameter weights are to be applied, which significantly alter the f inal index, appropriate transformation procedures should be adopted fo r the purpose of consistency over time and between different geographi cal areas.