CEREBROVASCULAR-DISEASE ASSESSED BY COLOR-FLOW AND POWER DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHY - COMPARISON WITH DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY IN INTERNAL CAROTID-ARTERY STENOSIS

Citation
B. Griewing et al., CEREBROVASCULAR-DISEASE ASSESSED BY COLOR-FLOW AND POWER DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHY - COMPARISON WITH DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY IN INTERNAL CAROTID-ARTERY STENOSIS, Stroke, 27(1), 1996, pp. 95-100
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System","Peripheal Vascular Diseas","Clinical Neurology
Journal title
StrokeACNP
ISSN journal
00392499
Volume
27
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
95 - 100
Database
ISI
SICI code
0039-2499(1996)27:1<95:CABCAP>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Background and Purpose An understanding of carotid atherosclerosis is important to further our knowledge regarding the etiology of cerebral ischemia, and therefore it is necessary to accurately visualize caroti d stenosis. The purpose of the present study was to compare different imaging techniques to determine their advantages and disadvantages in the diagnosis and quantification of middle- and high-grade internal ca rotid artery stenosis. In particular, we were interested in evaluating the effectiveness of the new ultrasound technique power Doppler. Meth ods Fifty-four patients with greater than 50% extracranial internal ca rotid artery stenosis, as determined by continuous-wave Doppler, were recruited prospectively to serve as subjects. All subjects were examin ed with color-flow Doppler, power Doppler, and digital subtraction ang iography to enable visualization of carotid stenosis and plaque surfac e morphology. Results Thirty-four middle-grade stenoses (50% to 69%), 32 high-grade stenoses (70% to 99%), and 7 complete occlusions of the internal carotid artery were diagnosed with the use of digital subtrac tion angiography. Power Doppler visualized stenosis significantly more frequently and accurately than color-flow Doppler. Color-flow Doppler tended to overestimate and underestimate in patients with both middle - and high-grade stenosis. Power Doppler was superior to both color-fl ow Doppler and angiography with regard to differentiation of plaque su rface morphology. Conclusions This study demonstrates that power Doppl er is an important, noninvasive imaging technique that has several adv antages over color-flow Doppler in diagnosing carotid artery stenosis and visualizing plaque surface. Power Doppler, used in concert with ot her ultrasound techniques, should enable a more accurate detection and treatment of cerebrovascular disease.