F. Bartl et al., AN INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON OF SAMPLE PRESENTATION METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF AQUEOUS-SOLUTIONS USING FOURIER-TRANSFORM INFRARED-SPECTROSCOPY, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry, 354(1), 1996, pp. 1-5
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy is becoming much more w
idely used as an analytical technique. It appears to be particularly u
seful for quantitative analysis, especially of aqueous solutions. Howe
ver, there is a considerable variation in the cost and quality of inst
rumentation as well as a large number of accessories for sample presen
tation employing attenuated total reflectance (ATR). The objectives of
the work reported in this paper were to investigate the effect of the
choice of instrumentation on the quality of quantitative analyses as
well as the effect of variable acquisition parameters. A series of exp
eriments was designed in which samples were distributed to a number of
workers using a range of FTIR instruments from different manufacturer
s and of differing quality. The workers were allowed to use the access
ory of their own choice and to carry out a quantitative analysis of gl
ucose solutions using their normal operating parameters. In following
experiments the effects of instrumental and purge were considered and
quantitative analysis was performed using a set of prescribed acquisit
ion conditions. The results showed that there were significant differe
nces in the quality of the spectra produced on the different combinati
ons. However, although each worker produced quite different linear cal
ibrations (in terms of slope and intercept), they all predicted the co
ncentration of an unknown with a similar accuracy. However,later exper
iments showed that the low-cost bench-top instruments were not always
so successful when the peaks used in the analysis were affected by res
idual water vapour interferences. Instrumental drift was noticeably wo
rse for the low-cost instruments but this was an effect that could eas
ily be eliminated by suitable baseline correction.