PROCEDURAL DEBIASING OF PRIMACY ANCHORING EFFECTS IN CLINICAL-LIKE JUDGMENTS/

Citation
Gh. Mumma et Sb. Wilson, PROCEDURAL DEBIASING OF PRIMACY ANCHORING EFFECTS IN CLINICAL-LIKE JUDGMENTS/, Journal of clinical psychology, 51(6), 1995, pp. 841-853
Citations number
61
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology, Clinical
ISSN journal
00219762
Volume
51
Issue
6
Year of publication
1995
Pages
841 - 853
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9762(1995)51:6<841:PDOPAE>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Primacy (or anchoring) effects in clinical judgment occur when informa tion presented at an early stage unduly influences a judgment compared to the effect of the same information presented at a later stage. Usi ng recent theoretical models of these effects, three debiasing methods were developed and tested for their efficacy. Contrary to some recent failures to find anchoring effects, both single-cue and sequence anch oring manipulations produced medium-size effects on personality trait ratings and generalized to predictions of behavior. A consider-the-opp osite procedure that involved cue sorting by diagnosticity debiased si ngle-cue anchoring, but comparable results were obtained by subjects w ho simply took notes while reviewing each cue prior to judgment. Bias inoculation was marginally successful at reducing single-cue anchoring . Methodological issues as well as suggestions for future research are discussed.