GH RESPONSIVENESS TO REPEATED GHRH OR HEXARELIN ADMINISTRATION IN NORMAL ADULTS

Citation
A. Sartorio et al., GH RESPONSIVENESS TO REPEATED GHRH OR HEXARELIN ADMINISTRATION IN NORMAL ADULTS, Journal of endocrinological investigation, 18(9), 1995, pp. 718-722
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism
ISSN journal
03914097
Volume
18
Issue
9
Year of publication
1995
Pages
718 - 722
Database
ISI
SICI code
0391-4097(1995)18:9<718:GRTRGO>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
GH responses, calculated as the net incremental area under the curve ( GH nAUC/h), to two consecutive 1 mu g/kg/bw iv GHRH boluses (administe red at 0 and 120 min, test a), to one 1 mu g/kg bw iv GHRH bolus follo wed by a 1 mu g/kg/bw iv hexarelin bolus (administered at 0 and 120 mi n, respectively, test b) and to two consecutive 1 mu g/kg/bw iv hexare lin boluses (administered at 0 and 120 min, test c) were evaluated in 6 normal adults. The first GHRH injection caused a clear rise in serum GH levels in all subjects (mean GH nAUC/h, test a: 832.1+/-59.4 ng/ml /h, range: 723.7+/-1074.0 ng/ml/h; test b: 859.2+/-122.9 ng/ml/h, rang e 618.0-1422.7 ng/ml/h). Hexarelin administration elicited a marked GH release (test c: 1424+/-208.2 ng/ml/h, range: 810.0-2154.0 ng/ml/h), which was significantly higher than those observed after GHRH (vs test a: p<0.02, vs test b: p<0.05). After the first GHRH bolus, the second GHRH injection (test a) was unable to sustain GH elevated levels (mea n GH nAUC: 74.5+/-26.5 ng/ml/h, range: 9.7-182.2 ng/ml/h), while hexar elin administration (test b) caused a clear GH rise in all subjects (G H nAUC: 1049.7+/-105.2 ng/ml/h, range: 786.0-1356.0 ng/ml/h), Repeated hexarelin administration (test c) was associated with a significant ( p<0.02) reduction of GH responses to the second bolus (286.6+/-43.1 ng /ml/h), which were however significantly higher than those observed af ter the second GHRH bolus (p<0.05). In conclusion, these results demon strate that repeated hexarelin administration causes a reduction of GH responsiveness, which is less marked than that induced by repeated GH RH administration, probably due to the more potent OH-releasing effect of hexarelin, Moreover, when administered after GHRH, hexarelin has a sustained GH-releasing effect in contrast to the poor efficacy of GHR H, thus suggesting that the acute effect of hexarelin is probably not mediated through hypothalamic GHRH pathways.