Rp. Donahue et al., THE FEMALE INSULIN ADVANTAGE IN A BIRACIAL COHORT - RESULTS FROM THE MIAMI COMMUNITY-HEALTH STUDY, International journal of obesity, 20(1), 1996, pp. 76-82
OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which gender differences in the
rate of insulin-mediated glucose disposal are influenced by difference
s in body fatness. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of a biracial sampl
e of men and women drawn from a population-based study. SUBJECTS: Twen
ty-five 25-44 year old residents of Dade County, FL. Twenty-five Afric
an-Americans (14 men and 11 women) and 28 white, nonHispanics (15 men
and 13 women). All participants were free of diabetes mellitus (WHO Cr
iteria). MEASUREMENTS: All persons volunteered to undergo a hyperinsul
inemic euglycemic clamp procedure to determine the rate of insulin-med
iated glucose disposal (insulin sensitivity, M). Several measures of b
ody fatness were quantified and the percentage body fat determined acc
ording to published equations. RESULTS: Men and women had similar unad
justed M values. Within each gender and ethnic group M was inversely r
elated to percentage body fat (r = -0.55 to -0.84; p < 0.05). After ad
justment for percentage body fat, women were more insulin sensitive th
an men (10.1 vs 5.1 mg/kg/min among African-Americans and 10.1 vs 6.9
mg/kg/min among white, nonHispanics; p < 0.05 for each). When M was ex
pressed per unit of fat free mass, women were still significantly more
insulin sensitive than men (p < 0.05 for each ethnic group). In multi
variate analyses, gender and percentage body fat were independently re
lated to M in both ethnic groups accounting for 70% of the variance am
ong African-American participants and 34% of the variance among white
non Hispanic participants. CONCLUSION: The similar M values between me
n and women despite the higher percent body fat among women indicate t
hat women are more insulin sensitive in muscle tissue than men. This w
as substantiated when M was normalized for fat free mass. This 'insuli
n advantage' may be related to the lower risk of coronary disease expe
rienced by women and the loss of this advantage may in part underlie t
he stronger deleterious effects of diabetes that women suffer.