A sensational offence by a recently released prisoner with a long hist
ory of sexual offending led to the scope of preventive detention being
extended in 1987 prompting a dramatic increase in use of this sentenc
e by the New Zealand courts. A committee of inquiry had previously cri
ticised this sentence, which provides for the indefinite detention of
dangerous offenders, as 'arbitrary, selective and inequitable' and rec
ommended its abolition. In the 1987-93 period, a total of 48 persons r
eceived this sentence compared with 28 during the previous 19 years. T
he revival of preventive detention is seen as a case study of law and
order politics as this previously little used sentence became a centra
l feature of the efforts of successive governments to respond to incre
asing levels of violent crime. The principal deficiencies of this sent
ence are identified as (1) inconsistency in its use; (2) ifs lack of f
ocus and the Court of Appeal's failure to provide meaningful guidance
to judges; and (3) the severity of the sentence which involves detenti
on for a minimum term of 10 years.