M. Igawa et al., IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL EVALUATION OF PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN,PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AND ALPHA-1-ANTICHYMOTRYPSIN IN HUMAN PROSTATE-CANCER, British Journal of Urology, 77(1), 1996, pp. 107-112
Objective To determine the relationship between growth fractions defin
ed by proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), prostate-specific ant
igen (PSA) and al-antichymotrypsin (ACT) staining in prostate cancer.
Materials and methods A total of 96 lesions, including 71 from prostat
e cancers and 25 from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were evaluate
d in microscopic sections of the prostatic tissues from 34 patients wi
th prostate cancer. Immunohistochemical staining was performed with an
avidin-biotin system using monoclonal anti-PCNA antibodies, polyclona
l anti-PSA and anti-ACT antibodies. Results There was a significant di
fference in the mean PCNA labelling index between tissue from prostate
cancer (4.2+/-7.1) and BPH (0.5+/-1.1) (P=0.002). The mean labelling
index of PCNA tended to increase with increasing Gleason score. The pr
oportion of cells positive for PSA was significantly higher in tissue
from BPH than from prostate cancer (P=0.005). While the proportion of
cells immunostaining for ACT was significantly higher in tissue from B
PH compared to that from prostate cancer (P=0.02), there was no signif
icant difference in the proportion of ACT-positive cells among prostat
e cancers of differing Gleason score. The mean labelling index of PCNA
decreased significantly with the increase in the proportion of PSA-po
sitive cells (P=0.013). There was a significant relationship between t
he proportion of ACT- and PSA-positive cells (P=0.001). Conclusion The
se results indicate a reciprocal relationship between cell growth and
tumour differentiation in prostate cancer. Although the significance o
f ACT deserves further study, there was evidence for the complexing of
PSA with ACT from the immunohistochemical studies.