NAUSEA AND VOMITING AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY - A COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTONE HALOTHANE ANESTHESIA/

Citation
A. Klockgetherradke et al., NAUSEA AND VOMITING AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY - A COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTONE HALOTHANE ANESTHESIA/, European journal of anaesthesiology, 13(1), 1996, pp. 3-9
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
ISSN journal
02650215
Volume
13
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
3 - 9
Database
ISI
SICI code
0265-0215(1996)13:1<3:NAVALS>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Sixty ASA I and II patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy or inguinal herniotomy were randomly assigned to one of two groups: G roup one (n=30): induction with thiopentone 4-6 mg kg(-1), fentanyl 2 mu g kg(-1), pancuronium 0.03 mg kg(-1), and succinylcholine 1 mg kg(- 1), maintainance with halothane (0.8-1.5%), and N2O in O-2 (Fio(2)=0.3 3). Group two (n=30): induction with propofol 2-3 mg kg(-1), fentanyl 2 mu g kg(-1), pancuronium 0.03 mg kg(-1), and succinylcholine 1 mg kg (-1), maintainance with propofol 6-10 mg kg(-1) h(-1), and O-2 in N-2 (Fio(2):0.33). Seven of the patients experienced nausea in each group with group one having higher emetic scores. Six patients in group one vomited compared to none in group two (P < 0.05). The overall incidenc e of emetic sequelae (nausea or vomiting) was 43% in group one and 23% in group two (P=0.17). Patients with propofol anaesthesia had lower e metic scores and higher recovery scores compared with those after thio pentone/halothane anaesthesia.