Y. Ahmedsaid et al., THE CENTRAL HOGGAR-TAOURIRT AND ALBITE-TOPAZ POST PAN-AFRICAN GRANITES (SOUTHERN ALGERIA) - THEIR PETROLOGY, GEOCHEMISTRY AND PETROGENESIS, Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie. Abhandlungen, 170(1), 1995, pp. 21-57
Detailed field, petrological and mineralogical studies of two 540- 520
Ma post Pan-African granitoids from Central Hoggar, southern Algeria,
show them to have two contrasting mineralogies. The topaz-albite (AT)
granitoids are peraluminous rocks containing protolithionite and were
probably derived from a volatile-rich magma. The Taourirt (T) granite
s are also peraluminous but are siderophyllitic biotite- and hornblend
e-bearing rocks formed from a volatile poorer melt compared with the A
T granites but the aplopegmatitic stockscheiders are genetically relat
ed to these AT granites. The protolithionites are Li- and F-rich (Li2O
= 1.86 +/- 0.58 wt %; F 3.65 +/- 1.19 wt %) Mg-poor (0.12 +/- 0.12 wt
%) and have many unoccupied octahedral sites (Sigma(VI) = 4.76 +/- 0.
27 a.p.f.u.). The substitutions 2Fe(2+) (2Mg(2+))(Ti4+) <--> Al-IV + L
i commonly found in biotites occurring in similar granitoids were insi
gnificant during the crystallization of biotite in the Hoggar AT grani
tes and stockscheiders. The siderophyllitic biotites are Fe-rich (FeO
= 26.57 +/- 3.38), relatively rich in Li (Li2O = 0.36 +/- 0.15 wt %)
and F (1.11 +/- 0.68 wt %), and have variable Mg contents (MgO = 1.89
+/- 1.01 wt %). The substitutions 2Fe(2+)(2Mg(2+))(Ti4+) <-> Al-VI Li,
and 2Al <-> 3Fe(2+) (3Mg2+) were important during the crystallization
of biotite in these T granites. The T granites, which have steep REE
patterns, (Ce/Yb)(CN) = 5.96 +/- 3.14, were generated by fractionation
of plagioclase +/- K-feldspar +/- biotite +/- magnetite (ilmenite) +/
- hornblende +/- allanite but the AT granites exhibit flat REE pattern
s (Ce/Yb)(CN) = 0.76 +/- 0.52, and have formed by fractionation of mai
nly plagiodase +/- biotite +/- K-feIdspar +/- monazite. Modelling of R
b, Ba, Sr, La, Ce, Sm, Eu, Yb, Lu, Y and (Sr-87/Sr-86) isotopic ratios
indicates that the two granites do not represent simple segregated me
lts, they were not generated by combined wall rock assimilation-fracti
onal crystallization processes of an evolving mantle-derived magma nor
do they represent the evolved end-members of the magma from which the
spatially associated 670-570 Ma early-late Pan-African granites were
crystallized. The chemistry of these early-late orogenic granites coul
d be explained by subduction related magmatism whereas the the post Pa
n-African granites melts produced in the lower crust from heterogeneou
s sources.