INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF THE COMMUNITY PREVALENCE OF SYMPTOMS OF PROSTATISM IN 4 COUNTRIES

Citation
Pp. Sagnier et al., INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF THE COMMUNITY PREVALENCE OF SYMPTOMS OF PROSTATISM IN 4 COUNTRIES, European urology, 29(1), 1996, pp. 15-20
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
03022838
Volume
29
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
15 - 20
Database
ISI
SICI code
0302-2838(1996)29:1<15:ICOTCP>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
We conducted an international comparison of the prevalence of urinary symptoms of prostatism in 4 countries, using a community-based random sampling of subjects, similar study procedures, and a single definitio n of cases that was based on a standardized symptom questionnaire. In Scotland 1,994 medically eligible men aged 40-79 years agreed to parti cipate from 3 communities of the Forth Valley. In France, a nation-wid e survey was conducted cross-sectionally in a representative sample of 2,011 French men aged 50-84 years. In the USA, the Olmsted County (OC ) study recruited an age- and urban/rural-stratified random sample of 2,115 county residents drawn from medically eligible men aged 40-79 ye ars. In Japan, 290 men aged 40-79 years from a fishing village partici pated in the study. Response rates were 55, 53, 55, and 43% in Sotland , France, OC and Japan, respectively. Urinary symptoms were assessed b y the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS), after metrologic v alidation in English and cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnair e. The prevalence of moderate to severe symptoms (I-PSS > 7) were 14, 18, 38, and 56% in France, Scotland, OC and Japan, respectively. This pattern was consistent within decades of age, and was found for most o f the individual urinary symptoms. The proportion of men in Japan repo rting very low I-PSS (0 or 1) was approximately 2, 4 and 8 times less frequent, than in OC, Scotland, and France, respectively. Differences in the prevalence of reported urinary symptoms might reflect between-c ountry differences in the true prevalence of benign prostatic hyperpla sia. However, cross-cultural differences in the perception and/or will ingness to report urinary symptoms may play an important role in the o bserved differences. Further study will be required to elucidate the u nderlying causes of the observed differences.