MUTATIONAL SPECIFICITY OF 1-(2-CHLOROETHYL)-3-CYCLOHEXYL-1-NITROSOUREA IN THE ESCHERICHIA-COLI LAC1 GENE OF O-6-ALKYLGUANINE-DNA ALKYLTRANSFERASE-PROFICIENT AND ALKYLTRANSFERASE-DEFICIENT STRAINS
J. Jurado et al., MUTATIONAL SPECIFICITY OF 1-(2-CHLOROETHYL)-3-CYCLOHEXYL-1-NITROSOUREA IN THE ESCHERICHIA-COLI LAC1 GENE OF O-6-ALKYLGUANINE-DNA ALKYLTRANSFERASE-PROFICIENT AND ALKYLTRANSFERASE-DEFICIENT STRAINS, Molecular carcinogenesis, 14(4), 1995, pp. 233-239
Forward mutations induced by 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitroso
(CCNU) in the lad gene of Escherichia coli were recovered from bacteri
a proficient (Ogt(+) Ada(+)) and deficient (Ogt(-) Ada(-)) in O-6-alky
lguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity. A CCNU dose of 1 mM was select
ed for DNA sequence analysis. A total of 245 induced mutations were ch
aracterized. The mutations were almost exclusively (95%) CG-->AT trans
itions, indicating that CCNU-induced mutations arose in bacteria prima
rily from misreplication of O-6-chloroethylguanine, in total agreement
with results obtained for monofunctional alkylating agents. The distr
ibution of CCNU-induced GC-->AT mutations was significantly altered by
the presence of DNA alkyltransferase activity (P = 0.01). In the Ogt(
+) Ada(+) mutational spectrum, guanines flanked on both sides by A:T b
ase-pairs were on average 2.8 times more likely to mutate than those f
lanked by G:C base-pairs on at least one side. This bias disappeared i
n the Ogt(-) Ada(-) genetic background, thereby providing evidence tha
t O-6-chloroethylated guanines adjacent to G:C base-pairs are better t
argets for bacterial alkyltransferase than those not adjacent to G:C b
ase-pairs. We recently reported a similar bias for ethyl methanesulfon
ate, strengthening the idea that CCNU is acting as a simple ethylating
compound. In summary, this paper presents for the first time evidence
that DNA repair by O-6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferases plays a maj
or role in removing lesions responsible for GC-->AT transitions induce
d by CCNU, influencing their ultimate distribution with respect to seq
uence context. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.