HISTOLOGIC AND MICRORADIOLOGIC COMPARISON OF BLOCK AND PARTICULATE CANCELLOUS BONE AND MARROW GRAFTS IN RECONSTRUCTED MANDIBLES BEING CONSIDERED FOR DENTAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT

Citation
T. Shirota et al., HISTOLOGIC AND MICRORADIOLOGIC COMPARISON OF BLOCK AND PARTICULATE CANCELLOUS BONE AND MARROW GRAFTS IN RECONSTRUCTED MANDIBLES BEING CONSIDERED FOR DENTAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 54(1), 1996, pp. 15-20
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
ISSN journal
02782391
Volume
54
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
15 - 20
Database
ISI
SICI code
0278-2391(1996)54:1<15:HAMCOB>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Purpose: Patterns of healing were investigated in mandibles reconstruc ted with three different techniques to assess their readiness for impl ant placement. Patients and Methods: The subjects were 10 patients who had undergone mandibular reconstruction with either nonvascularized i liac block bone grafts (group 1, 3 patients), particulate cancellous b one and marrow (PCBM) grafts (group 2; 3 patients) for mandibular disc ontinuity, or PCBM grafts for mandibular marginal defects (group 3; 4 patients), Six (groups 2 and 3) or 12 months (group 1) after mandibula r reconstruction, bone biopsy specimens were obtained for histologic e xamination with a trephine bur. As controls, bone specimens were obtai ned from ungrafted mandibles of patients undergoing dental implant pla cement. Undecalcified specimens were embedded in polyester resin and e xamined by routine light microscopy and microradiography. Results: The morphology of the specimens from group 1 was similar to that of group 2, but not to that of the control subjects. However, the morphology o f specimens from group 3 was generally similar to that of control subj ects. Conclusion: These results suggest that mandibular reconstruction with PCBM grafts allows the placement of dental implants sooner than reconstruction with block bone grafts.