HISTOLOGIC AND MICRORADIOLOGIC COMPARISON OF BLOCK AND PARTICULATE CANCELLOUS BONE AND MARROW GRAFTS IN RECONSTRUCTED MANDIBLES BEING CONSIDERED FOR DENTAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT
T. Shirota et al., HISTOLOGIC AND MICRORADIOLOGIC COMPARISON OF BLOCK AND PARTICULATE CANCELLOUS BONE AND MARROW GRAFTS IN RECONSTRUCTED MANDIBLES BEING CONSIDERED FOR DENTAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 54(1), 1996, pp. 15-20
Purpose: Patterns of healing were investigated in mandibles reconstruc
ted with three different techniques to assess their readiness for impl
ant placement. Patients and Methods: The subjects were 10 patients who
had undergone mandibular reconstruction with either nonvascularized i
liac block bone grafts (group 1, 3 patients), particulate cancellous b
one and marrow (PCBM) grafts (group 2; 3 patients) for mandibular disc
ontinuity, or PCBM grafts for mandibular marginal defects (group 3; 4
patients), Six (groups 2 and 3) or 12 months (group 1) after mandibula
r reconstruction, bone biopsy specimens were obtained for histologic e
xamination with a trephine bur. As controls, bone specimens were obtai
ned from ungrafted mandibles of patients undergoing dental implant pla
cement. Undecalcified specimens were embedded in polyester resin and e
xamined by routine light microscopy and microradiography. Results: The
morphology of the specimens from group 1 was similar to that of group
2, but not to that of the control subjects. However, the morphology o
f specimens from group 3 was generally similar to that of control subj
ects. Conclusion: These results suggest that mandibular reconstruction
with PCBM grafts allows the placement of dental implants sooner than
reconstruction with block bone grafts.