ROLE OF ALLOGENEIC BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION FROM AN HLA-IDENTICAL SIBLING OR A MATCHED UNRELATED DONOR IN THE TREATMENT OF CHILDREN WITHJUVENILE CHRONIC MYELOID-LEUKEMIA
F. Locatelli et al., ROLE OF ALLOGENEIC BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION FROM AN HLA-IDENTICAL SIBLING OR A MATCHED UNRELATED DONOR IN THE TREATMENT OF CHILDREN WITHJUVENILE CHRONIC MYELOID-LEUKEMIA, British Journal of Haematology, 92(1), 1996, pp. 49-54
Seven children (age range 1.8-11 years) with juvenile chronic myelomon
ocytic leukaemia (JCML) received an allogeneic bone marrow transplanta
tion (BMT), four from an HLA-identical sibling and three from a matche
d unrelated donor. In the four children transplanted using an HLA-iden
tical sibling, conditioning regimen included busulfan (BU), cyclophosp
hamide (CY) and melphalan (L-PAM), whereas: graft-versus-host disease
(GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine-A (Cs-A). The preparative
regimen was well tolerated and all patients engrafted promptly. None
of the patients have relapsed and all four children remain in haematol
ogical remission after an observation time of 7,24,25 and 48 months, r
espectively. Of the three children given BMT from an unrelated volunte
er, one was < 2 years of age and she received the BU/CY/L-PAM regimen.
In view of the increased risk of graft rejection described in patient
s transplanted from unrelated donors, we chose to prepare the other tw
o patients with fractionated total body irradiation (TBI), thiotepa an
d CY. Cs-A, short-term methotrexate and Campath-1G in vivo were employ
ed to prevent GVHD in this group of patients. Graft failure with autol
ogous reconstitution of haemopoiesis occurred in the child given the c
hemotherapy-based regimen. One of the two girls given TBI relapsed aft
er BMT; therefore only one of the three patients who received a marrow
transplant from a matched unrelated donor survives in complete haemat
ological remission 10 months after BMT. Our study suggests that the co
nditioning regimen we employed for allogeneic BMT from a compatible si
bling is an effective means of eradicating the leukaemic clone. In our
experience, results obtained using unrelated donors are less satisfac
tory and, at present, the use of such donors seems to be riskier and a
ssociated with a lower success rate as compared with BMT from an HLA-i
dentical sibling.