TESTICULAR CANCER AND PARENTAL USE OF FERTILIZERS IN AGRICULTURE

Citation
P. Kristensen et al., TESTICULAR CANCER AND PARENTAL USE OF FERTILIZERS IN AGRICULTURE, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 5(1), 1996, pp. 3-9
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
10559965
Volume
5
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
3 - 9
Database
ISI
SICI code
1055-9965(1996)5:1<3:TCAPUO>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Testicular cancer incidence is increasing rapidly in several countries . Environmental causes acting early in life are suspected but have not yet been identified. We conducted a cohort study to identify parental risk factors for testicular cancer among farmers' sons. Children born in 1952-1991 to parents who were farm holders at the time of the agri cultural censuses in 1969-1989 were identified in the Central Populati on Register (Oslow, Norway). The resulting cohort of male offspring (n = 166,291) were followed up in the Cancer Registry of Norway (Oslo, N orway) for 1965-1991. Exposure indicators were derived from census inf ormation on activities on the farm. The cancer incidence was compared with that of the total rural population, and potential risk factors we re analyzed by Poisson regression. In a follow-up of 2,924,663 person- years, 158 incident cases of testicular cancer were identified. The st udy population had a higher incidence of testicular cancer than did th e total rural population, particularly at ages 15-19 years and in west ern Norway. Specific fertilizer regimens on the farm were associated w ith testicular cancer (rate ratio = 2.44; 95% confidence interval = 1. 663.56), in particular nonseminoma (rate ratio = 4.21; 95% confidence interval = 2.13-8.32). The rate ratio estimates were highest for boys ages 15-19 years and for a subset of study subjects who were considere d more likely to have grown up on a farm. Nondifferential misclassific ation and bias toward unity are likely because exposure information wa s available only at the farm level and only for census years. The fert ilizer indicators were not available early in life for most subjects, and precise interpretations are difficult. A hypothesis worth consider ing is that excess nutrient runoff from agriculture constitutes a risk . However, inferences concerning the biological basis of our observati ons can scarcely be made.