O. Lenz et al., EFFECTS OF ANGIOTENSIN-II AND ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITORS ON HUMAN MYOCARDIUM, European journal of pharmacology, 294(1), 1995, pp. 17-27
Human myocardial angiotensin II receptors and the angiotensin AT(1) an
d AT(2) receptor subtypes were characterised using the partial angiote
nsin II receptor agonist [I-125][Sar(1),IIe(8)]angiotensin II and the
selective antagonists losartan (1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)-methyl
]imidazole) and PD 123177 3-methylphenyl)methyl]-5-(diphenyl-acetyl)-4
,5,6,7 tetrahydro-1H-imidazol[4,5-c]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid). The d
ensity of angiotensin II receptors was higher in atrial than in ventri
cular myocardium. Angiotensin AT(2) receptors were predominant in atri
a and ventricles (80-85% of total angiotensin II receptors). Only in i
solated, electrically driven atrial trabeculae but not in ventricular
preparations, angiotensin II did produce a concentration-dependent pos
itive inotropic effect, which was antagonized exclusively by the angio
tensin AT(1) receptor antagonist losartan and which amounted to about
20% of the positive inotropic effect of milrinone and isoprenaline. Th
e application of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors captopri
l, enalaprilat and ramiprilat had no inotropic effect in either tissue
. It is concluded that angiotensin AT(1) receptors exclusively mediate
direct positive inotropic effects in atrial myocardium. Since angiote
nsin-converting enzyme inhibitors do not produce any inotropic effect,
tonic regulation of basal force of contraction by angiotensin II does
not occur.