Ca. Pelizzari et al., VOLUMETRIC VISUALIZATION OF ANATOMY FOR TREATMENT PLANNING, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 34(1), 1996, pp. 205-211
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: Delineation of volumes of interest for three-dimensional (3D)
treatment planning is usually performed by contouring on two-dimensio
nal sections. We explore the usage of segmentation-free volumetric ren
dering of the three-dimensional image data set for tumor and normal ti
ssue visualization. Methods and Materials: Standard treatment planning
computed tomography (CT) studies, with typically 5 to 10 mm slice thi
ckness, and spiral CT studies with 3 mm slice thickness were used. The
data were visualized using locally developed volume-rendering softwar
e. Similar to the method of Drebin et al., CT voxels are automatically
assigned an opacity and other visual properties (e.g., color) based o
n a probabilistic classification into tissue types. Using volumetric c
ompositing, a projection into the opacity-weighted volume is produced.
Depth cueing, perspective, and gradient-based shading are incorporate
d to achieve realistic images. Unlike surface-rendered displays, no ha
nd segmentation is required to produce detailed renditions of skin, mu
scle, or bony anatomy. By suitable manipulation of the opacity map, ti
ssue classes can be made transparent, revealing muscle, vessels, or bo
ne, for example. Manually supervised tissue masking allows irrelevant
tissues overlying tumors or other structures of interest to be removed
. Results: Very high-quality renditions are produced in from 5 s to 1
min on midrange computer workstations. In the pelvis, an anteroposteri
or (AP) volume rendered view from a typical planning CT scan clearly s
hows the skin and bony anatomy. A muscle opacity map permits clear vis
ualization of the superficial thigh muscles, femoral veins, and arteri
es. Lymph nodes are seen in the femoral triangle. When overlying muscl
e and bone are cut away, the prostate, seminal vessels, bladder, and r
ectum are seen in 3D perspective. Similar results are obtained for tho
rax and for head and neck scans. Conclusion: Volumetric visualization
of anatomy is useful in treatment planning, because 3D views can be ge
nerated without the need for segmentation. When relationships among an
atomical structures, rather than geometric models of them, are importa
nt, volume rendering presents advantages. The presented algorithm is r
eadily adaptable to distributed parallel implementation on a network o
f heterogeneous workstations.