EVALUATION OF A REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE-POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION ASSAYFOR DETECTING ST-LOUIS ENCEPHALITIS-VIRUS USING FIELD-COLLECTED MOSQUITOS (DIPTERA, CULICIDAE)
Sj. Nawrocki et al., EVALUATION OF A REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE-POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION ASSAYFOR DETECTING ST-LOUIS ENCEPHALITIS-VIRUS USING FIELD-COLLECTED MOSQUITOS (DIPTERA, CULICIDAE), Journal of medical entomology, 33(1), 1996, pp. 123-127
A reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay (RT-PCR) was c
ompared with a tissue culture assay (TC) and an enzyme immunoassay (ET
A) to detect St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) in mosquito pools. Ov
erall, 1,725 mosquito pools with a low viral prevalence (3.3%-5.0%) we
re tested. The comparison of the EIA to TC showed that the EIA was 0.9
47 sensitive, 0.988 specific, and 0.987 accurate. Comparison of RT-PCR
to TC showed that the RT-PCR was 0.947 sensitive, 0.980 specific, and
0.979 accurate. Comparison of the RT-PCR to EIA showed that the RT-PC
R was 0.878 sensitive, 0.987 specific, and 0.982 accurate. Because of
speed, accuracy, and cost, either the RT-PCR or the EIA is recommended
as the primary screen. RT-PCR has an advantage over EIA, because the
amplified product contains sequence information which can confirm its
identity. TC, EIA, or both can be applied as a 2nd assay for the confi
rmation of samples suspected as positives by the RT-PCR.