Sn. Tesh, MIASMA AND SOCIAL-FACTORS IN DISEASE CAUSALITY - LESSONS FROM THE 19TH-CENTURY, Journal of health politics, policy and law, 20(4), 1995, pp. 1001-1024
Conventional public health wisdom holds that the end of the nineteenth
century saw a dramatic change in beliefs about what causes disease, a
s early convictions about the importance of broad social factors gave
way to a concentration on microorganisms. I argue, however, that in bo
th the middle and late nineteenth century nearly everyone, professiona
ls and laypeople alike, saw disease causality in terms of precise, inv
isible entities, and that prevention policies were as reductionist and
narrow as the available technology would allow. My argument is based
on a rereading of the primary documents that other scholars have seen
as supporting the idea of two distinct public health periods, and on a
new interpretation of the revisionist history that questions the idea
. I suggest that health policy analysts today are too vague about the
meaning of ''social factors'' and that disease prevention policies mig
ht be better if the term was clarified.