COST- AND RISK-BENEFIT CONSIDERATIONS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CLINICAL STAGE-I NONSEMINOMATOUS TESTICULAR-TUMORS

Background: The high curability of clinical stage I nonseminomatous ge rm cell tumors (NSGCTs) and the availability of equally effective mana gement options (retroperitoneal lymph node dissection [RPLND] and surv eillance) allows for treatment decisions based on secondary end points , including short- and long-term toxicity and cost relative to benefit . The purpose of this study was to perform cost-benefit and risk-benef it analyses of management options in clinical stage I NSGCT using data from the literature and Indiana University. Methods: The overall cost s for 100 patients undergoing a primary RPLND were compared with the t otal costs of 100 patients managed by surveillance for clinical stage I disease. These two options were then analyzed in terms of survival, late relapse, acute and chronic toxicity (including fertility), and pe rioperative morbidity. Results: The overall costs of these two approac hes were essentially identical. The two options were similar in terms of survival, although RPLND demonstrated superiority in terms of ferti lity, toxicity, and late relapse. Conclusions: The choice of nerve-spa ring RPLND or surveillance in a clinical stage I NSGCT patient cannot be made on the basis of cost as a discriminator. Instead, the decision should be made based on patient desires, physician expertise, biologi cal predictors, and short- and long-term toxicity.