Even after extensive re-working of past data, in many instances we are
incapable of resolving important aspects concerning climate change an
d variability. Virtually every monitoring system and data set requires
better data quality, continuity, and homogeneity* if we expect to co
nclusively answer questions of interest to both scientists and policy-
makers. This is a result of the fact that long-term meteorological dat
a, (both satellite and conventional) both now and in the past, are and
have been collected primarily for weather prediction, and only in som
e cases, to describe the current climate. Long-term climate monitoring
, capable of resolving decade-to-century scale changes in climate, req
uires different strategies of operation. Furthermore, the continued de
gradation of conventional surface-based observing systems in many coun
tries (both developed and developing) is an ominous sign with respect
to sustaining present capabilities into the future. Satellite-based ob
serving platforms alone will not, and cannot, provide all the necessar
y measurements. Moreover, it is clear that for satellite measurements
to be useful in long-term climate monitoring much wiser implementation
and monitoring practices must be undertaken to avoid problems of data
inhomogeneity that currently plague space-based measurements. Continu
ed investment in data analyses to minimize time-varying biases and oth
er data quality problems from historical data are essential if we are
to adequately understand climate change, but they will never replace f
oresight with respect to ongoing and planned observing systems require
d for climate monitoring. Fortunately, serious planning for a Global C
limate Observing System (GCOS) is now underway that provides an opport
unity to rectify the current crisis.