COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF 1.5 COMPARED WITH 3.0 G ORALSLOW-RELEASE MESALAZINE (PENTASA) IN THE MAINTENANCE TREATMENT OF ULCERATIVE-COLITIS
P. Fockens et al., COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF 1.5 COMPARED WITH 3.0 G ORALSLOW-RELEASE MESALAZINE (PENTASA) IN THE MAINTENANCE TREATMENT OF ULCERATIVE-COLITIS, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 7(11), 1995, pp. 1025-1030
Objective: To investigate a possible dose-effect relationship with two
dosages of oral slow-release mesalazine in patients with quiescent ul
cerative colitis. Method: One hundred and sixty-nine patients with ulc
erative colitis in remission were treated with either 1.5 or 3.0 g/day
mesalazine for 1 year or until relapse into active colitis. Results:
Fewer of the 3.0 g dose group relapsed than of the 1.5 g dose group (3
3 compared with 46%). This difference failed to reach statistical sign
ificance (P = 0.057). A significant relationship between age and relap
se rate was established. No dose-related adverse events were found. Th
ree serious drug-related adverse events were, however, reported. All o
f the serious adverse reactions resolved after the medication was disc
ontinued. Conclusion: There is a trend for high doses of oral mesalazi
ne to be more effective in prevention of relapse of ulcerative colitis
. These higher doses are not associated with a higher incidence of adv
erse reactions.