We examine the following paradox: in a dynamic setting equilibria can
be radically different in a model with a finite number of agents than
in a model with a continuum of agents. We present a simple strategic s
etting in which this paradox is a general phenomenon. However the para
dox disappears when there is noisy observation of the players' actions
, and the aggregate level of noise does not disappear too rapidly as t
he number of players increases. We give several economic examples in w
hich this paradox has recently received attention: durable-goods monop
oly, corporate takeovers, and time consistency of optimal government p
olicy.