Dg. Thomas et al., RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF BOLUS PHENYLEPHRINE OR EPHEDRINE FOR MAINTENANCE OF ARTERIAL-PRESSURE DURING SPINAL-ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 76(1), 1996, pp. 61-65
Thirty-eight healthy women undergoing elective Caesarean section under
spinal anaesthesia at term were allocated randomly to receive boluses
of either phenylephrine 100 mu g or ephedrine 5 mg for maintenance of
maternal arterial pressure. The indication for administration of vaso
pressor was a reduction in systolic pressure to less than or equal to
90% of baseline values. Maternal arterial pressure (BP) and heart rate
(HR) were measured every minute by automated oscillometry. Cardiac ou
tput (CO) was measured by cross-sectional and Doppler echocardiography
before and after preloading with 1500 ml Ringer lactate solution and
then every 2 min after administration of bupivacaine. Umbilical artery
pulsatility index (PI) was measured using Doppler before and after sp
inal anaesthesia. The median (range) number of boluses of phenylephrin
e and ephedrine was similar; 6 (1-10) vs 4 (1-8) respectively. Materna
l systolic BP and CO changes were similar in both groups, but the mean
[95% CI] maximum percentage change in maternal HR was larger in the p
henylephrine group (-28.5 [-24.2, -32.9]%) than in the ephedrine group
(-14.4 [-10.6, -18.2]%). As a consequence atropine was required in 11
/19 women in the phenylephrine group compared with 2/19 in the ephedri
ne group (P < 0.01). Mean umbilical artery pH [95% CI] was higher in t
he phenylephrine group (7.29 [7.28-7.30]) than in the ephedrine group
(7.27 [7.25-7.28]). The results of the present study support the use o
f phenylephrine for maintenance of maternal arterial pressure during s
pinal anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section.