INDICATIONS AND IMMEDIATE PATIENT OUTCOMES OF PATHOLOGY INTRAOPERATIVE CONSULTATIONS - A COLLEGE-OF-AMERICAN-PATHOLOGISTS CENTERS-FOR-DISEASE-CONTROL AND PREVENTION OUTCOMES WORKING GROUP-STUDY
Rj. Zarbo et al., INDICATIONS AND IMMEDIATE PATIENT OUTCOMES OF PATHOLOGY INTRAOPERATIVE CONSULTATIONS - A COLLEGE-OF-AMERICAN-PATHOLOGISTS CENTERS-FOR-DISEASE-CONTROL AND PREVENTION OUTCOMES WORKING GROUP-STUDY, Archives of pathology and laboratory medicine, 120(1), 1996, pp. 19-25
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology,"Medical Laboratory Technology","Medicine, Research & Experimental
Objective.-To evaluate the reasons (indications) for and immediate int
raoperative surgical results (outcomes) associated with pathology intr
aoperative consultation. Design.-ln 1992 and 1993, surgeons collaborat
ed with pathologists in 472 voluntarily participating institutions fro
m the United States (462), Canada (7), Australia (2), and New Zealand
(1) in a study jointly sponsored by the College of American Pathologis
ts and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pathologists se
lected 20 consecutive intraoperative consultations and assembled a cov
er letter, a checklist questionnaire, and a copy of the corresponding
surgical pathology report, all of which were sent to the surgeon(s) fo
r retrospective evaluation. Participants.-The study was distributed to
participants in the College of American Pathologists voluntary Q-Prob
es quality improvement and Surgical Pathology Performance Improvement
programs and to Canadian and Australian hospitals with more than 200 b
eds. Results.-Evaluation of 9164 cases established the five most commo
n indications for intraoperative consultation: (1) establish or confir
m diagnosis to determine type or extent of operation (51%), (2) confir
m adequacy of margins (16%), (3) confirm nature of tissue to direct sa
mpling for immediate culture or other laboratory study (10%), (4) expe
dite obtaining diagnosis to inform family or patient (8%), and (5) con
firm sufficient tissue submitted to secure diagnosis in permanent sect
ion (8%). The information provided by the intraoperative consultation
resulted in changed surgical procedures that were either modified, ter
minated, or newly initiated in 47%, 30%, 6%, 9%, and 28% of cases, cor
responding respectively to each of the above five common indications.
Rarely cited reasons for intraoperative consultation were to expedite
obtaining diagnosis for surgeon's knowledge (3%), to facilitate patien
t management, other professional communication or discharge planning p
rior to permanent section availability (3%), academic protocol (<1%),
and consultation not needed or no reason for request (<1%). Conclusion
s.-This multi-institutional, interdisciplinary database confirms that
pathology intraoperative consultations, regardless of the initial indi
cations, influence immediate patient care decisions, resulting in chan
ged surgical procedures in an average of 39% of all operative cases.