L. Kobrynski et al., A COMPARISON OF ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE AND FLOW-CYTOMETRY FOR THE DETECTION OF NATURAL LATEX-SPECIFIC HUMAN-IMMUNOGLOBULIN-E, Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 3(1), 1996, pp. 42-46
In vitro correlates of type 1 hypersensitivity to natural latex (NL) p
roteins continue to be limited by both sensitivity and specificity. Me
thods which have detection limits in the picogram range, namely, radio
allergosorbent assays (RAST) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (E
LISA), are inadequate for the identification of NL hypersensitivity: i
n certain-at-risk groups, such as health care workers, A How cytometry
assay (FCA), previously shown to be comparable to RAST and ELISA in t
he identification of NL-sensitized pediatric patients with spina bifid
a, was compared with electrochemiluminescence (ECL) in the evaluation
of pediatric patients with spina bifida and NL-sensitized adult health
care workers, As with RAST and ELISA, ECL is capable of detecting pic
ogram amounts of specific analyte, The ECL assay detected NL-specific
immunoglobulin E (NL-IgE) in three of six health care workers with str
ong histories of NL hypersensitivity, All six patients were negative b
y FCA. Further, 2 of 11 spina bifida patients found to be NL-IgE negat
ive by FCA were NL-IgE positive by ECL, These findings suggest that in
sensitivity the ECL assay is an improvement over the FCA for the iden
tification of NL-sensitive individuals.