POLYGRAPHERS DILEMMA OR PSYCHOLOGISTS CHIMERA - A REPLY TO FUREDYS LOGICO-ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL PRACTITIONERS AND RESEARCHERS

Citation
Cr. Honts et al., POLYGRAPHERS DILEMMA OR PSYCHOLOGISTS CHIMERA - A REPLY TO FUREDYS LOGICO-ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL PRACTITIONERS AND RESEARCHERS, International journal of psychophysiology, 20(3), 1995, pp. 199-207
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Experimental","Psychology, Biological",Psychology,Neurosciences,Physiology
ISSN journal
01678760
Volume
20
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
199 - 207
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-8760(1995)20:3<199:PDOPC->2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
We respond to Furedy's article in this journal where he raised an issu e he referred to as the ''Polygrapher's dilemma'' (Furedy, J.J. (1993) Int. J. Psychophysiol., 15: 263-267). Furedy claimed that the control question test, the most commonly applied psychophysiological detectio n of deception test, is inherently subjective and harmful to subjects in both the field and the laboratory. Fortunately, Furedy's arguments were based on inaccurate representations of the control question test and on flawed logic. To correct Furedy's misrepresentations, we presen t an accurate description of how the control question test is used and evaluated. We then examine the results of empirical research that add ress Furedy's concerns. Furedy's concerns are found to be lacking on a lmost all counts. Finally, we discuss the findings from several studie s that Furedy failed to mention but are directly relevant to the issue s he raised.