CONTROL OF THE HEAD IN RESPONSE TO TILT OF THE BODY IN NORMAL AND LABYRINTHINE-DEFECTIVE HUMAN-SUBJECTS

Citation
T. Kanaya et al., CONTROL OF THE HEAD IN RESPONSE TO TILT OF THE BODY IN NORMAL AND LABYRINTHINE-DEFECTIVE HUMAN-SUBJECTS, Journal of physiology, 489(3), 1995, pp. 895-910
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00223751
Volume
489
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
895 - 910
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3751(1995)489:3<895:COTHIR>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
1. Head movement responses to discrete, unpredictable tilts of the tru nk from earth upright were studied in normal and labyrinthine-defectiv e (LD) subjects. Tilts of the seated, restrained trunk, were delivered in pitch and roll about head-centred axes and approximated raised cos ine displacements with peak amplitudes of 20-30 deg and durations of 1 .5-2 s. Subjects performed mental arithmetic with eyes closed or read earth-fixed text. 2. At the onset of tilt the head momentarily lagged behind the trunk because of inertia. Subsequently, head control varied widely with three broad types: (i) head relatively fixed to the trunk (in normal subjects and some patients); (ii) head unstable, falling i n the direction of gimbal tilt (typical of acute patients for pitch mo tion); (iii) compensatory head movement in the opposite direction to g imbal tilt (observed consistently in normal subjects and in well-adapt ed patients). 3. EMG was well developed in subjects with compensatory head movement and consisted of an initial burst of activity at minimum latencies of 25-50 ms (means 72-108 ms), followed by a prolonged peak ; both occurring in the 'side up' neck muscles, appropriate for righti ng the head. These muscles are shortened during the initial head lag s o the responses cannot be stretch reflexes. In normal subjects their o rigin is predominantly labyrinthine but in patients they may be an 'un loading response' of the neck. 4. Head stability in space was superior with the visual task for all subjects but vision only partially compe nsated for labyrinthine signals in unstable patients. 5. Modelling the responses to tilt suggests that, in LD subjects, the short-latency bu rst could be dris en by signals from the neck of the relative accelera tion between head and trunk tilt. The longer latency EMG could be driv en by a signal of head tilt in space. Normally, this signal is probabl y otolithic. In patients it could be synthesized from summing proprioc eptive signals of position of head on trunk with trunk tilt.