This paper reports two experiments that test Wolpert's' (1990) claim t
hat musicians and nonmusicians differ in their memory for melodies bec
ause nonmusicians' memory performance reflects a greater use of the ti
mbre dimension to make recognition decisions. In both experiments, lis
teners were asked to identify which of two test melodies, a target and
a distracter, was heard previously. On one half of the trials, the ta
rget melody was in the same timbre as the original, and the distracter
was in a different timbre. For the other half of the trials, the dist
racter melody was in the same timbre as the original, and the target m
elody was in a different timbre. In her earlier study, Wolpert found t
hat nonmusicians' memory for melodies was affected by timbre changes,
whereas musicians' memory was not. In the present experiments, we cont
rolled for instruction clarity and brought listener performance down f
rom near perfect. As a result, it was found that timbre changes differ
entially affected neither musicians' nor nonmusicians' memory for melo
dies.