Gj. Endres et Wh. Ahrens, FALL-APPLIED TRIFLURALIN GRANULES IN CONSERVATION-TILL SPRING WHEAT (TRITICUM-AESTIVUM), Weed technology, 9(4), 1995, pp. 703-709
Field experiments were conducted to evaluate postplant crop residue, g
reen and yellow foxtail control, and wheat grain yield after fall appl
ication of trifluralin granules in undisturbed small grain stubble. Le
vels of postplant residue were at least 48% cover (line transect metho
d) and 2750 kg/ha of aboveground dry matter where herbicide granules w
ere left unincorporated or were incorporated with conservation-till me
thods, including an undercutter, rotary hoe, or undercutter followed b
y a rotary hoe, Trifluralin at 0.56 kg/ha applied as granules in mid O
ctober in untilled stubble and incorporated with conservation-till met
hods controlled foxtail 81 to 88%, with control appearing slightly low
er when granules were not incorporated. The 81 to 88% foxtail control
in conservation-till treatments was comparable to control achieved wit
h trifluralin at 0.56 kg/ha applied in mid October on conventionally-t
illed soil and incorporated by a field cultivator. Foxtail control imp
roved somewhat as trifluralin rate was increased to 0.84 and 1.12 kg/h
a in conservation-till treatments, Slight wheat stand reductions at 1.
12 kg/ha of trifluralin did not appear to reduce wheat yield. Fall app
lication of trifluralin granules in these high-residue conditions appa
rently minimizes herbicide losses by photodecomposition and volatility
, thereby facilitating good trifluralin efficacy the following season.