Pr. Williamson et al., ENDORECTAL ULTRASOUND OF T3 AND T4 RECTAL CANCERS AFTER PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIATION, Diseases of the colon & rectum, 39(1), 1996, pp. 45-49
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the accuracy and ability
of endorectal ultasound (ERUS) to predict changes in rectal tumor stag
e after a preoperative chemo-radiation protocol. METHODS::Since Decemb
er 1990, all rectal malignancies at our institution have been preopera
tively staged with ERUS. ERUS has been an essential tool in preoperati
ve staging of rectal cancer patients, possessing an overall accuracy o
f 84 percent for T stage and 81 percent for lymph node status in our h
ands (Williamson PR, unpublished data). Beginning in July 1992, all pa
tients staged with T3 or T4 lesions on initial ERUS have been entered
into a protocol consisting of preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT
). This protocol consists of patients receiving 4,500 to 5,040 rads fo
r five to eight weeks and concomitantly receiving sensitizing doses of
5-fluorouracil and/or leucovorin. All patients were scheduled for sph
incter-saving or abdominoperineal resections six to eight weeks follow
ing completion of CRT. A repeat ERUS was performed on each patient one
week before surgery. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 15 patient
s who completed CRT, including 12 males and 3 females. Evidence of tum
or shrinkage via ERUS measurement was seen in all patients. Average tu
mor shrinkage as assessed by ERUS was 16 percent by width and 32 perce
nt by depth of invasion. Sonographic level of invasion and nodal statu
s were each downstaged in 38 percent of patients. Pathologic evaluatio
n comparison revealed that the level of invasion was downstaged in 47
percent and nodal status in 88 percent compared with initial ERUS stag
ing. Of those patients downstaged, 4 of 11 (36 percent) revealed no tu
mor in the pathology specimen. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude from our early
experience that although ERUS offers a method for assessing degree of
shrinkage and down-staging of T3 and T4 lesions after CRT, presently
it does not closely predict the pathologic results. Results are strong
ly related to the experience of the ultrasonographer. The ability to d
istinguish tumor from radiation-induced changes to perirectal tissues
is under continued investigation, and a new method of interpreting the
data obtained by ERUS after CRT will need to be established.