Ws. Dockens, TIMES FEMININE ARROW - A BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGICAL ASSAULT ON CULTURAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL BARRIERS, Behavioral science, 41(1), 1996, pp. 30-82
Like a powerful, hardly perceptible wall, the psychoanthropological ba
rrier lies between the group formulations that characterize social psy
chology, sociology, and ethnology and the subjective reasoning that ch
aracterize individual modes of thought. More obviously, but equally as
formidable, are the epistemological differences separating researcher
s within each of the scientific disciplines. As a consequence, humanit
ies, behavioral sciences and biological sciences in General, and gener
al systems in particular, lack the connectivity necessary for the broa
d unified approach that is prerequisite to applying multidisciplinary
research to complex social, personal, ethnic, and gender problems. Eig
en & Winkler's game theory optimization, together with recent developm
ents in mathematics, microgenetics and ethnology, make it possible to
integrate the social physics of Nicolas Rashevsky and the game theory
formulations of Anatol Rapoport to produce Synchrony, a unified approa
ch, which though not a seamless web, comes as close to a seamless web
as is theoretically possible. But in accepting Synchrony, behavioral s
cientists must first learn to play GO, then adopt the concepts of dual
cognition, dual time scales, self-reference, chance and necessity. Ph
ilosophers and ethnologists must deal with ecological ''optimizations'
' of ethics and cultures. And, finally, as far as groups are concerned
, all will have to give up permanent hierarchies, adopt a ''feminine''
mode of reasoning as optimal, then accept behavioral science's role o
f ''Guardian of Time's Feminine Arrow.