TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PROSTATIC NERVE BLOCKADE EASES SYSTEMATIC NEEDLE-BIOPSY OF THE PROSTATE

Citation
Pa. Nash et al., TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PROSTATIC NERVE BLOCKADE EASES SYSTEMATIC NEEDLE-BIOPSY OF THE PROSTATE, The Journal of urology, 155(2), 1996, pp. 607-609
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00225347
Volume
155
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
607 - 609
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5347(1996)155:2<607:TUPNBE>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Purpose: We assessed the effect of transrectal ultrasound guided prost atic nerve blockade on the discomfort associated with systematic needl e biopsy of the prostate. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomi zed double-blind study was performed of 64 patients requiring systemat ic biopsy of the prostate. Patients were randomly assigned to receive an injection of 5 ml. 1% lidocaine or 5 ml. saline (0.9% sodium chlori de) at the vascular pedicle on 1 side of the prostate only. They were then asked to score the severity of discomfort of the injection and su bsequent biopsies on each side. Results: Mean pain scores were signifi cantly lower on the side with than the side without lidocaine injectio n (1.6 +/- 0.9 versus 2.4 +/- 1.2, p <0.0001) and not significantly di fferent when saline was injected (2.9 +/- 1.2 versus 3.0 +/- 1.1, p = 0.52). Pain scores were significantly different when the lidocaine inj ected side was compared to the saline solution injected side (p <0.000 1) but the difference was not significant between the noninjected side s of the 2 groups (p = 0.076). Of the patients in the lidocaine group 68% reported that they would prefer to undergo biopsy with the injecti on compared to only 41% in the placebo group (p = 0.037). During the s tudy no patient in either group had any adverse effect from the inject ion. Conclusions: Transrectal ultrasound guided nerve blockade before prostatic biopsy results in a more comfortable procedure for the patie nt.