Jm. Power et al., THE EFFECTS OF PERIOD MUTATIONS AND LIGHT ON THE ACTIVITY RHYTHMS OF DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER, Journal of biological rhythms, 10(3), 1995, pp. 267-280
Strains of Drosophila melanogaster homozygous for alleles of the perio
d gene (per(0), per(L), per(S), and per(+)) were reared for multiple g
enerations either in light:dark cycles (LD), continuous illumination (
LL), or chronic darkness (DD). The locomotor activity of adult flies f
rom these cultures was monitored in either LL or DD. Flies that were r
eared and tested in DD had a lower proportion of individuals with norm
al circadian rhythms than flies reared in LD or LL and tested in DD. T
he activity rhythms of DD-reared DD-tested animals, when present, show
ed phase coherence within two out of seven populations, while 8 out of
10 LL-reared DD-tested showed phase coherence. Flies tested in LL wer
e largely devoid of circadian rhythms regardless of their rearing envi
ronment. Ultradian rhythms were more evident under conditions disrupti
ve to circadian rhythmicity, but were observed in the presence and abs
ence of circadian rhythms. The periods of the ultradian rhythms of LL-
reared DD-tested and LD-reared DD-tested flies varied significantly am
ong genotypes, while in other rearing and testing regimes, no relation
ship was found.