This article presents a comparative study for cooling aerospace planes
, using liquid H-2, CH4, He, Ne, N-2, and Ar. The ascending optimized
trajectory to minimize the heat load in the hypersonic part is used to
perform the study. The study includes the cooling for the stagnation
point, the leading edges for wings and engine, and other parts of the
aerospace plane that are close to the leading edges. The laminar case
for the stagnation point and both laminar and turbulent cases for the
leading-edge heating have been considered. The amount of heat rate (to
tal, radiative, and convective) and the mass of liquid coolant needed
for cooling are calculated. A design of minimum inlet-outlet areas for
the amount of liquid needed for cooling is made with the consideratio
n of the coolant's physical constraints in liquids and gaseous states.
The comparison shows that the hydrogen is a clear winner as a candida
te for coolant and it saves mass as compared to all other five coolant
s. The study shows that there are no fundamental barriers for the cool
ing system of the vehicle in terms of its coolant mass and area size f
or coolant passage, especially if H-2 is used.