Jr. Petrie et al., HEMODYNAMICS, CARDIAC CONDUCTION AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF MIBEFRADIL (RO-40-5967), A NOVEL CALCIUM-ANTAGONIST, Journal of hypertension, 13(12), 1995, pp. 1842-1846
Objectives: Mibefradil (Ro 40-5967) is a chemically novel non-dihydrop
yridine calcium antagonist. In this phase II study we compared its acu
te and chronic effects on blood pressure, heart rate and atrioventricu
lar conduction (electrocardiographic PQ interval) with those of verapa
mil and diltiazem. Patients and methods: After a 4-week placebo run-in
, 18 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were given
single doses of mibefradil (150 mg), slow-release (SR) verapamil (240
mg), diltiazem (240 mg) and placebo at weekly intervals; pharmacokinet
ics and the effects on blood pressure, heart rate and PQ interval were
studied on four 10-h study days. Seventeen of the same patients subse
quently underwent 4 weeks of treatment with either mibefradil (100 mg
daily; n = 10) or verapamil SR (240 mg daily; n = 7), and on the last
day, they attended a further 10-h study day. Two studies were conducte
d: an acute, single-dose, double-blind, randomly allocated, placebo-co
ntrolled, crossover study and a chronic, open-label, randomly allocate
d, parallel-group study. Results: Mibefradil was well tolerated. In th
e acute study, the antihypertensive effect (difference from placebo) o
f mibefradil 150 mg was of slower onset than that of verapamil or dilt
iazem, but comparable blood pressure reductions had been achieved by 6
h. The mean+/-SD maximal PQ prolongation (difference from placebo) wa
s 15.6+/-16.1 ms, compared with 44.0+/-22.6 ms for verapamil and 56.0/-48.9 ms for diltiazem (P<0.05 mibefradil versus verapamil; P<0.01 mi
befradil versus diltiazem). In the chronic study there were no signifi
cant differences during steady-state conditions between mibefradil at
100 mg and verapamil SR at 240 mg in their effects on blood pressure,
PQ and heart rate. The mean+/-SD elimination half-life (t(1/2)) of mib
efradil under steady-state conditions was 26.8+/-5.5 h (versus an appa
rent t(1/2) of 16.9+/-11.1 h for verapamil SR, P<0.05). Conclusions: M
ibefradil is a well-tolerated and efficacious antihypertensive agent w
ell suited to single daily dosing because of its intrinsic long plasma
half-life. The effects on both blood pressure and PQ interval are of
more gradual onset than those of unmodified verapamil and diltiazem af
ter single doses.