PURPOSE: To examine MR characteristics and enhancement patterns of spi
nal ependymomas and compare these data with histopathologic subtypes.
METHODS: The MR images from 26 cases of pathologically proved spinal e
pendymomas were evaluated with respect to seven criteria: signal chara
cteristics, enhancement pattern, length of involvement, cysts or syrin
xes, hemorrhage, bony changes, and type of cord expansion. Signal char
acteristics were then correlated with histologic subtype. RESULTS: In
the category of enhancement pattern, our results differed markedly fro
m published data, with only 38% of cases demonstrating classic homogen
eous enhancement. The remainder of our cases (62%) demonstrated other
enhancement patterns, including heterogeneous (31%), rim (19%), minima
l (6%), and no enhancement (6%). Pathologic comparison revealed that o
ne histologic subtype, the myxopapillary ependymoma, demonstrated uniq
ue imaging characteristics on TI-weighted images. A highly statistical
ly significant percentage of this variant was hyperintense on T1, wher
eas most nonmyxopapillary ependymomas were hypointense. CONCLUSION: Th
e radiologist should be aware of alternative patterns of enhancement o
f spinal ependymomas and not be dissuaded from the diagnosis in approp
riate clinical settings. In addition, one histologic subtype, myxopapi
llary, often exhibits signal characteristics different from nonmyxopap
illary types, appearing hyperintense on T1 probably because of their i
ntracellular and perivascular accumulation of mucin.