A DOUBLE-BLIND CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING WORLD-HEALTH-ORGANIZATION ORAL REHYDRATION SOLUTION WITH A REDUCED OSMOLARITY SOLUTION CONTAINING EQUAL AMOUNTS OF SODIUM AND GLUCOSE
M. Santosham et al., A DOUBLE-BLIND CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING WORLD-HEALTH-ORGANIZATION ORAL REHYDRATION SOLUTION WITH A REDUCED OSMOLARITY SOLUTION CONTAINING EQUAL AMOUNTS OF SODIUM AND GLUCOSE, The Journal of pediatrics, 128(1), 1996, pp. 45-51
Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of an oral rehydration s
olution (ORS) containing 75 mmol/L of sodium and glucose each with the
standard World Health Organization (WHO) ORS among Egyptian children
with acute diarrhea. Methods: One hundred ninety boys, aged 1 to 24 mo
nths, who were admitted to the hospital with acute diarrhea and signs
of dehydration were randomly assigned to receive either standard ORS (
311 mmol/L) or a reduced osmolarity ORS (245 mmol/L). Intake and outpu
t were measured every 3 hours. Results: In the group treated with redu
ced osmolarity ORS, the mean stool output during the rehydration phase
was 36% lower (95% confidence interval, 1%, 100%) than in those treat
ed with WHO ORS. The relative risk of vomiting during the rehydration
phase was significantly lower in children treated with reduced osmolar
ity ORS (relative risk, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2, 4.8). Durin
g the maintenance phase, stool output, mean intake of food and ORS, du
ration of diarrhea, and weight gain were similar in the treatment grou
ps. The relative risk of treatment failure (need for unscheduled admin
istration of intravenous fluids) was significantly increased in childr
en receiving standard WHO ORS (relative risk, 7.9; 95% confidence inte
rval, 1.1, 60.9). The mean serum sodium concentration at 24 hours was
significantly lower in children receiving the reduced osmolarity ORS s
olution (134 +/- 6 mEq/L) than in children receiving the standard WHO
ORS (138 +/- 7 mEq/L) (p < 0.001). The relative risk of the developmen
t or worsening of hyponatremia was not increased in children given the
reduced osmolarity ORS, and urine output was similar in the treatment
groups. Conclusion: The reduced osmolarity ORS has beneficial effects
on the clinical course of acute diarrhea in children by reducing stoo
l output, and the proportion of children with vomiting during the rehy
dration phase, and by reducing the need for supplemental intravenous t
herapy. These results provide support for the use of a reduced osmolar
ity ORS in children with acute noncholera diarrhea.