V. Sigurdardottir et al., QUALITY-OF-LIFE AND ETHICS - OPINIONS ABOUT CHEMOTHERAPY AMONG PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED MELANOMA, NEXT OF KIN AND CARE-PROVIDER, Psycho-oncology, 4(4), 1995, pp. 287-300
The treatment of generalized malignant melanoma is purely experimental
and palliative. Despite rather pessimistic results from numerous clin
ical trials with aggressive combination chemotherapy clinical trials a
re still considered among the main options for making progress. During
a period of three years, a longitudinal quality of life (QoL) study w
as performed in connection with one such clinical trial, part of the S
wedish Melanoma Programme. Parallel to the QoL measures, questions con
cerning the value of treatment and communication about treatment toxic
ity were consecutively put to patients with advanced disease, their ne
xt-of-kin and nurses. During this period we followed professionals dea
ling with everyday medical, psychological and ethical aspects of aggre
ssive chemotherapy in the context of palliation. In connection with th
e official closure of the QoL assessments, a questionnaire study addre
ssing opinions on chemotherapy and ethical conflicts related to the cu
rrent treatment was performed. All professional categories working at
the Melanoma Unit of The Karolinska Hospital participated in this stud
y. By combining these two sources of information, we have tried to giv
e a broad picture of attitudes towards chemotherapy for palliation of
metastatic melanoma. After 2-3 months of therapy half of the patients
reported the treatment troublesome, 50% felt it had been helpful and v
ery few had thought about stopping the treatment. The patients communi
cated mainly with their family about treatment toxicity, leaving the n
urses with insufficient information to assess effects on an individual
level. The relatives therefore seem to be more appropriate proxy rate
rs than the nurses in the present palliative situation, at least conce
rning the value of treatment. The questionnaire study revealed fewer d
ifferences between staff members than expected. The staff had an overw
helmingly positive attitude to chemotherapy and found satisfaction in
their work. They sought motivation in this meaningful work and the fee
ling of being really needed by patients. The environment, a university
clinic with an active treatment tradition, undoubtedly modifies the p
ersonnel's attitudes and coping strategies. It seems reasonable to ass
ume that the professional's view increases the patient's enthusiasm fo
r chemotherapy.