VELCRO ON THE SLIPPERY SLOPE - THE ROLE OF PSYCHIATRY IN ACTIVE VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA

Objective: The aim of the paper is to determine the role that psychiat rists should play in legislation that establishes a right to active vo luntary euthanasia (AVE). Method: One version of the ''slippery slope' ' argument, usually invoked against the legalisation of AVE, is recast as an argument for the introduction of strong safeguards in any futur e AVE legislation. The literature surrounding the prevalence of psychi atric illnesses in the terminally ill, physicians' ability to identify such illnesses and the aetiology of suicide in the terminally ill is examined. Results: The strength of the slippery slope argument, combin ed with the poor ability of general physicians to diagnose psychiatric illness in the terminally ill, demands that any legislation allowing AVE should require a mandatory psychiatric review of the patient reque sting euthanasia. Conclusions: Any legislation adopted that establishe s a right to active voluntary euthanasia should include a mandatory ps ychiatric review of the person requesting euthanasia and a cooling off period before the request is acceded to. In addition, the discovery o f a serious mental illness ought to disqualify the affected person fro m the right to AVE until that illness resolves.