A modified version of the mere exposure effect paradigm was utilized i
n an implicit artificial grammar learning task in an attempt to develo
p a procedure that would be more sensitive in assessing nonconscious l
earning processes than the methods currently utilized within the field
of implicit learning. Subjects were presented with stimuli generated
from a finite-state artificial grammar and then had to either (a) deci
de if novel items conformed to the rule structure of the grammar or (b
) rate the degree to which they liked novel items. Because the latter
task was the more indirect of the two procedures, subjects' ability to
discriminate between well-formed and ill-formed items on this liking
task was taken as a more sensitive piece of evidence of implicit learn
ing, compared to performance on the rule conformity task. A subsequent
test of subjects' explicit knowledge of the rules of the grammar show
ed that subjects do have some conscious knowledge of the artificial gr
ammar, but subjects initially making liking decisions exhibited signif
icantly less conscious rule knowledge than subjects initially making r
ule-conformity judgments. The findings are discussed in relation to th
e synergistic relationships among implicit perception, implicit memory
, and implicit learning processes. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc.