B. Gutin et al., PHYSICAL-TRAINING, LIFE-STYLE EDUCATION, AND CORONARY RISK-FACTORS INOBESE GIRLS, Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 28(1), 1996, pp. 19-23
The effects of supervised physical training (PT) and lifestyle educati
on (LSE) on risk factors for coronary artery disease and non-insulin-d
ependent diabetes mellitus were compared in obese 7- to 11-yr-old blac
k girls. The subjects were divided into two groups. The PT group (N =
12) completed a 5-d . wk(-1), 10-wk, aerobic training program; and the
LSE group participated in weekly lifestyle discussions to improve exe
rcise and eating habits. The PT group showed a significant increase in
aerobic fitness (P < 0.05) and decrease in percent body fat (P < 0.05
), while the LSE group declined significantly more in dietary energy a
nd percent of energy from fat (P < 0.05). Fasting insulin did not chan
ge significantly. The LSE group declined significantly more than the P
T group in glucose (P < 0.05), and glycohemoglobin declined from basel
ine in both groups (P < 0.05). Lipid changes were similar in the two g
roups: total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein cholesterol (P < 0.0
1) and triglycerides (P < 0.05) declined, the low density lipoprotein
(LDL)/apoproteinB ratio increased (which indicates a decrease in small
dense LDL) (P < 0.05) and lipoprotein(a) increased (P < 0.05). Thus,
the interventions were similarly effective in improving some diabetoge
nic and atherogenic factors, perhaps through different pathways; i.e.,
the PT improved fitness and fatness, while the LSE improved diet. Exe
rcise and diet-induced changes in lipoprotein(a) require further inves
tigation.