H. Okarma, THE TROPHIC ECOLOGY OF WOLVES AND THEIR PREDATORY ROLE IN UNGULATE COMMUNITIES OF FOREST ECOSYSTEMS IN EUROPE, Acta Theriologica, 40(4), 1995, pp. 335-386
Predation by wolves Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758 in ungulate communities
in Europe, with special reference to the multi-species system of Bial
owieza Primeval Forest (Poland/Belarus), was assessed on the basis res
ults of original research and literature. In historical times (post-gl
acial period), the geographical range of the wolf and most ungulate sp
ecies in Europe decreased considerably. Community richness of ungulate
s and potential prey for wolves, decreased over most of the continent
from 5-6 species to 2-3 species. The wolf is typically an opportunisti
c predator with a highly diverse diet; however, cervids are its prefer
red prey. Red deer Cervus elaphus are positively selected from ungulat
e communities in all localities, moose Alces alces are the major prey
only where middle-sized species are scarce. Poe deer Capreolus capreol
us are locally preyed on intensively, especially where they have high
density, co-exist mainly with moose or wild boar Sus scrofa, and red d
eer is scarce or absent. Wild boar are generally avoided, except in a
few locations; and European bison Bison bonasus are not preyed upon by
wolves. Wolf predation contributes substantially to the total natural
mortality of ungulates in Europe: 42.5% for red deer, 34.5% for moose
, 25.7% for roe der, and only 16% for wild boar. Food niche breadth (B
) of wolves in Europe, calculated only for the ungulates considered in
this study, increases with the number of ungulate species in the comm
unity. There is also a significant relationship between ungulate commu
nity breadth and food niche breadth of wolves. Food niche breadth of w
olves, however, does not achieve very high values even in the richest
ungulate communities. Wolves easily adapt to locally abundant food of
anthropogenic origin (livestock, garbage). The level of predation on l
ivestock may be a result of different husbandry practices (eg use of l
ivestock guarding dogs) rather than of differences in availability of
wild and domestic prey. Available data from Europe suggest that wolves
likely limit density of red deer and moose in some areas. Poe deer de
nsity can be decreased locally by wolves but is limited mainly by lynx
Lynx lynx. Wild boar density is more influenced by mast crops of Quer
cus spp. and Fagus silvatica (and to a lesser extent by snow depth) th
an by wolf predation.