EFFECTS OF COMBINING PROPOFOL AND ALFENTANIL ON VENTILATION, ANALGESIA SEDATION AND EMESIS IN HUMAN VOLUNTEERS

Citation
Dj. Pavlin et al., EFFECTS OF COMBINING PROPOFOL AND ALFENTANIL ON VENTILATION, ANALGESIA SEDATION AND EMESIS IN HUMAN VOLUNTEERS, Anesthesiology, 84(1), 1996, pp. 23-37
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00033022
Volume
84
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
23 - 37
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-3022(1996)84:1<23:EOCPAA>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Background: Propofol and alfentanil frequently are administered togeth er for intravenous sedation. This study investigated pharmacokinetic a nd pharmacodynamic interactions between propofol and alfentanil, at se dative concentrations, with specific regard to effects on ventilation, analgesia, sedation, and nausea. Methods: Ten male volunteers underwe nt steady-state infusions on 3 separate days consisting of propofol al one, alfentanil alone, or a combination of the two. Target plasma conc entrations for propofol were 150, 300, and 600 ng/ml for 1 h at each c oncentration; for alfentanil it was 40 ng/ml for 3 h. Assessment inclu ded serial measurements of (1) ventilatory function (minute ventilatio n, carbon dioxide production, end-tidal carbon dioxide, ventilatory re sponse to rebreathlng 7% CO2); (2) analgesia (subjective pain report i n response to graded finger shock and evoked potential amplitude); (3) sedation (subjective rating, observer scores, and digit symbol substi tution test); (4) nausea (visual analog scale, 0-100 mm). Results: Dur ing combination treatment, propofol plasma concentration was 22% great er than during propofol alone using replicate infusion schemes (P < 0. 009). End-tidal carbon dioxide was unchanged by propofol, and increase d equally by alfentanil and alfentanil/propofol combined (Delta end-ti dal carbon dioxide 7.5 and 6.2 mmHg, respectively). Analgesia with pro pofol/alfentanil combined was greater than with alfentanil alone. (Pai n report decreased 50% by PA vs. 28% for alfentanil, P < 0.05). Sedati on was greater with propofol/alfentanil combined than with alfedtanil or propofol alone (digit symbol substitution test 30 for propofol/alfe ntanil combined us. 57 for alfentanil, and 46 for propofol, P < 0.05). Nausea occurred in 50% of subjects during alfentanil, but in none dur ing propofol/alfentanil combination treatment. Conclusions: The combin ation of propofol and alfentanil produced greater sedation and analges ia than that with either drug alone. Propofol offset the emetic effect s of alfentanil. Equivalent depression of the carbon dioxide response curve, and elevation of end-tidal carbon dioxide occurred with propofo l/alfentanil combined and alfentanil.