FAILURE TO AGREE ON THE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS OF VENTRICULAR-TACHYCARDIA

Citation
Me. Herbert et al., FAILURE TO AGREE ON THE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS OF VENTRICULAR-TACHYCARDIA, Annals of emergency medicine, 27(1), 1996, pp. 35-38
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
ISSN journal
01960644
Volume
27
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
35 - 38
Database
ISI
SICI code
0196-0644(1996)27:1<35:FTAOTE>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Study objective: To determine the extent of interobserver agreement in the ECG diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia (VT) by using a four-ste p algorithm and three observers. Methods: Simulated emergency departme nt setting from records of an urban university teaching hospital. Ail ECGs taken in the ED during a 2-year period that showed a QRS duration of more than 120 msec and a heart rate faster than 110 beats per minu te were reviewed. ECGs were categorized as demonstrating sinus rhythm (SR), irregular broad-complex tachycardia (I-BCT), or regular broad-co mplex tachycardia (BCT). Copies of the BCT ECGs and short clinical his tories were given to each of three emergency physicians, who used a pu blished, four-step algorithm (the Brugada algorithm) to categorize the BCT ECGs as indicating VT, indicating supraventricular tachycardia wi th aberrancy (SVT-A), or indeterminate. Interobserver agreement was as sessed with the kappa-statistic. Results: The records contained 178 EC Gs, 88 of which were SR, 63 I-BCT, and 27 BCT. The 27 BCT ECGs were se lected for review. The emergency physicians disagreed with each other 22% of the time in differentiating VT from SVT-A (kappa=.58). Conclusi on: Application of the algorithm to actual clinical practice in the ED would probably result in the misdiagnosis of a substantial minority o f patients having BCT, with potentially serious adverse consequences.