Me. Herbert et al., FAILURE TO AGREE ON THE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS OF VENTRICULAR-TACHYCARDIA, Annals of emergency medicine, 27(1), 1996, pp. 35-38
Study objective: To determine the extent of interobserver agreement in
the ECG diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia (VT) by using a four-ste
p algorithm and three observers. Methods: Simulated emergency departme
nt setting from records of an urban university teaching hospital. Ail
ECGs taken in the ED during a 2-year period that showed a QRS duration
of more than 120 msec and a heart rate faster than 110 beats per minu
te were reviewed. ECGs were categorized as demonstrating sinus rhythm
(SR), irregular broad-complex tachycardia (I-BCT), or regular broad-co
mplex tachycardia (BCT). Copies of the BCT ECGs and short clinical his
tories were given to each of three emergency physicians, who used a pu
blished, four-step algorithm (the Brugada algorithm) to categorize the
BCT ECGs as indicating VT, indicating supraventricular tachycardia wi
th aberrancy (SVT-A), or indeterminate. Interobserver agreement was as
sessed with the kappa-statistic. Results: The records contained 178 EC
Gs, 88 of which were SR, 63 I-BCT, and 27 BCT. The 27 BCT ECGs were se
lected for review. The emergency physicians disagreed with each other
22% of the time in differentiating VT from SVT-A (kappa=.58). Conclusi
on: Application of the algorithm to actual clinical practice in the ED
would probably result in the misdiagnosis of a substantial minority o
f patients having BCT, with potentially serious adverse consequences.