Mc. Harsanyi et al., SUBSTITUENT-DEPENDENT NITRATION OF 9-SUBSTITUTED 9,10-DIHYDRO-9,10-ETHANOANTHRACENES, Australian Journal of Chemistry, 48(12), 1995, pp. 1949-1967
Mononitration of 9-substituted ethanoanthracenes, bearing Me, Bu(t), F
, Br, I, OMe, NO2, CN, CHO or CO(2)Me substituents at the bridgehead c
arbon, was found to occur exclusively at the beta-positions of the aro
matic ring. The mononitro products were isolated, identified by H-1 n.
m.r. spectroscopy, and their relative proportions were estimated by qu
antitative g.l.c. and/or by H-1 n.m.r. spectroscopy. For all the above
substrates the proportion of nitration at the beta-position meta to t
he bridgehead carbon bearing the substituent [to give compounds of the
general form (4)] was greater than the proportion of nitration at the
corresponding beta-position para to the bridgehead substituent [to gi
ve compounds of the general form (3)]. Whilst the preferential nitrati
on at the beta-positions of the aromatic rings is consistent with the
previously reported nitration of 9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthracene (2
a) itself, no observations of this preferential meta attack have been
made previously. No correlation could be made of this behaviour with a
vailable substituent parameters for the widely sterically and electron
ically disparate set of substituents used in this study, and the origi
n of this preferential attack remains unclear. Dinitration in this sys
tem was studied only superficially. The influence of the bridgehead su
bstituent together with that of the nitro group already present on one
aromatic ring appear to combine with quite unpredictable results in o
rienting the position of attack of the incoming nitro group onto the o
ther (non-nitrated) aromatic ring.