The need for biologically based, quantitative risk assessment procedur
es for noncancer endpoints such as neurotoxicity has been discussed in
reports by the United States Congress (Office of Technology Assessmen
t, OTA), National Research Council (NRC), and a federal coordinating c
ouncil. According to OTA, current attention and resources allocated to
health risk assessment research are inadequate and not commensurate w
ith its impact on public health and the economy. Methods to include co
ntinuous rather than dichotomous data for neurotoxicity endpoints, bio
markers of exposure and effects, and pharmacokinetic and mechanistic d
ata have been proposed for neurotoxicity risk assessment but require f
urther review and validation before acceptance, The purpose of this sy
mposium was to examine procedures to enhance the risk assessment proce
ss for neurotoxicants and to discuss techniques to make the process mo
re quantitative, Accordingly, a review of the currently used safety fa
ctor risk assessment approach for neurotoxicants is provided along wit
h specific examples of how this process may be enhanced with the use o
f the benchmark dose approach. The importance of including physiologic
ally based pharmacokinetic data in the risk assessment process and spe
cific examples of this approach is presented for neurotoxicants. The r
ole of biomarkers of exposure and effect and mechanistic information i
n the risk assessment process are also addressed, Finally, quantitativ
e approaches with the use of continuous neurotoxicity data are demonst
rated and the outcomes compared to those generated by currently used r
isk assessment procedures. (C) 1996 Society of Toxicology.