Catheter-related infections (CRI) are a major cause of febrile episode
s in hospitalized patients. Additionally, approximately 40% of primary
infections in intensive care patients are directly related to central
venous catheters. Despite the clinical significance of CRI diagnostic
procedures are still under debate. Clinical diagnosis which includes
systemic signs of infection and suppuration at the catheter entry site
is altogether a rare event. Therefore, most cases are still diagnosed
by laboratory methods. Although the semiquantitative roll-plate techn
ique is widely used and frequently regarded as gold standard, the disa
dvantages of a post-hoc diagnosis are obvious. In-situ techniques whic
h leave the suspected catheter in place include differential blood cul
tures, skin and hub cultures and a new method of microscopic screening
of blood drawn through the inflicted catheter. However, until now the
true value of all these methods still lack unanimous acceptance. Furt
her research is necessary to close the gap between clinical expectatio
ns and laboratory results.